↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche?

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
175 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche?
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/109793
Authors

Gupta, Manan, Prasad, N.G., Dey, Sutirth, Joshi, Amitabh, Vidya, T.N.C.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 8%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 49%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Philosophy 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#203,544
of 15,914,396 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#1,169
of 97,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,939
of 262,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#36
of 2,081 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,914,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,081 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.