| Title |
Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
bioRxiv, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1101/109793 |
| Authors |
Manan Gupta, N. G. Prasad, Sutirth Dey, Amitabh Joshi, T. N. C. Vidya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 19% |
| United States | 24 | 15% |
| Sweden | 7 | 5% |
| India | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 79 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 74 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 39% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#462,785
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#189
of 4,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,682
of 324,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#7
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.