↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
143 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/149369
Authors

Alexander, Lindsay M., Escalera, Jasmine, Ai, Lei, Andreotti, Charissa, Febre, Karina, Mangone, Alex, Vega Potler, Natan, Langer, Nicolas, Alexander, Alexis, Kovacs, Meagan, Litke, Shannon, O'Hagan, Bridget, Andersen, Jennifer, Bronstein, Batya, Bui, Anastasia, Bushey, Marijayne, Butler, Henry, Castagna, Victoria, Camacho, Nicolas, Chan, Elisha, Citera, Danielle, Clucas, Jon, Cohen, Samantha, Dufek, Sarah, Eaves, Megan, Fradera, Brian, Gardner, Judith, Grant-Villegas, Natalie, Green, Gabriella, Gregory, Camille, Hart, Emily, Horton, Megan, Harris, Shana, Lord, Catherine, Kahn, Danielle, Kabotyanski, Katherine, Karmel, Bernard, Kelly, Simon P, Kleinman, Kayla, Koo, Bonhwang, Kramer, Eliza, Lennon, Elizabeth, Mantello, Ginny, Margolis, Amy, Merikangas, Kathleen, Milham, Judith, Minniti, Giuseppe, Neuhaus, Rebecca, Nussbaum, Alexandra, Osman, Yael, Parra, Lucas, Pugh, Ken R., Racanello, Amy, Restrepo, Anita, Saltzman, Tian, Septimus, Batya, Tobe, Russ, Waltz, Rachel, Williams, Anna, Yeo, Anna, Castellanos, F. Xavier, Klein, Arno, Paus, Tomas, Leventhal, Bennett L., Craddock, Cameron, Koplewicz, Harold S., Milham, Michael P.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 39 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 11%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Computer Science 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 42 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#332,507
of 18,864,431 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#2,425
of 132,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,108
of 281,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#75
of 2,986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,864,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.