A low-cost DIY device for high resolution, continuous measurement of microbial growth dynamics
Sasidharan, Kalesh, Martinez-Vernon, Andrea S, Chen, Jing, Fu, Tiantian, Soyer, Orkun
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||58||52%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||2%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||<1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||8||21%|
|Student > Master||6||16%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||7||18%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||13%|
|Physics and Astronomy||3||8%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
of 212,779 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.