@michaelzlin @JudyandHuahua @YouAreLobbyLud @DavidJoffe64 @ejustin46 @AndrewHewat @DALupton Keep on dreaming, their own report😷 Actually you should know this in your position. Please refrain from spreading disinformation! https://t.co/vy6Sr7MKhD
Image from: https://t.co/8vEcDrmGB5
@weldeiry @biorxivpreprint @medrxivpreprint This paper may answer your question (Figure 6 in particular): https://t.co/QkBK2MPA6R
@Bob_Wachter bioRxiv preprints have watermarks that they aren’t peer reviewed and a special COVID disclaimer. And 20% seems low... prior work has had a much higher estimate (2/3rds). Takes a long time to publish so perhaps those 80% will be pub’d but aren
@RuneLinding @JeffDean @cshperspectives @barabasi @biorxiv_sysbio @biorxivpreprint There was this paper once https://t.co/x799ZaV9q2 Given that most scientist need a journal publication for their CV I assume most will be submitted to a journal.
@matteo_brainnet @dan_marinazzo Just found this crawler-based meta-analysis of these statistics: https://t.co/cikNCeGLpU
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/Ocqre7Wdsu #AcademicPublishing #Biology #DataScience [#AnimatedResearch #Example] https://t.co/gc4wWqVjQu
RT @blekhman: My favorite twitter moment from 2019: Edward Tufte liked our #dataviz! (don't read the second sentence) https://t.co/7GH79lP…
My favorite twitter moment from 2019: Edward Tufte liked our #dataviz! (don't read the second sentence)
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 yrs, Some 1 week | @richabdill @blekhman @UMNews @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/ivRIw6q4mh https://t.co/wm6QD7kDKL
Thanks for the conversation about bioRxiv. @PoseyLab ! Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv https://t.co/amAK64KS45
RT @JACoates91: @Matth_Chavent @TrumanLab @LindorffLarsen @biorxivpreprint @janhjensen @pedrobeltrao Sorry this took a while. But these mig…
RT @CFlensburg: @R_H_Ebright @benoitbruneau TO be fair, when they submitted, biorxiv barely existed, and was at a tiny fraction of today's…
RT @NatashaMhatre: @hayley_stev @david_colquhoun @ClaraSandelind @TristramWyatt @jknyman Here's a great preprint (now a paper) about Biorxi…
@hayley_stev @david_colquhoun @ClaraSandelind @TristramWyatt @jknyman Here's a great preprint (now a paper) about Biorxiv. We should really work to make this the norm. https://t.co/SdHhAv6AEW
@ABollmannMD @escardio @MihaiTrofenciuc @CMichaelGibson @DrPascalMeier @crisan_simina @ALEX_MISCHIE @BruiningNico @pauldub67 @mmamas1973 @medrxivpreprint As for the utility of #preprints, data suggests potentially huge benefit to authors (and we know I’m a
@BMittermaier @brembs @petermurrayrust @ppandelis @waltcrawford @natesjacobs @lteytelman @marcschiltz1 @deal_projekt @SpringerNature You've seen the graphs of preprint growth, haven't you? https://t.co/WTugiiSfKN https://t.co/lklZjQjI1b https://t.co/39ewka
RT @JACoates91: @Matth_Chavent @TrumanLab @LindorffLarsen @biorxivpreprint @janhjensen @pedrobeltrao Sorry this took a while. But these mig…
@Matth_Chavent @TrumanLab @LindorffLarsen @biorxivpreprint @janhjensen @pedrobeltrao Sorry this took a while. But these might be useful references for a talk on preprints and their advantages: https://t.co/VVxxlKhyGX https://t.co/J4SEOBX5Xf https://t.co/Nz
@karimjerbineuro @biorxiv_neursci @biorxivpreprint Might be of interest ! https://t.co/kzgArE5ywK
RT @CFlensburg: @R_H_Ebright @benoitbruneau TO be fair, when they submitted, biorxiv barely existed, and was at a tiny fraction of today's…
@R_H_Ebright @benoitbruneau TO be fair, when they submitted, biorxiv barely existed, and was at a tiny fraction of today's popularity. https://t.co/sNVkZm6xKE https://t.co/LJhsn3fBbI
RT @EricTopol: The remarkable impact of @biorxivpreprint's 1st 30,000 preprints https://t.co/inESUI5GeZ by @JoshuaLearn1 @NatureNews a sum…
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/yvATiCzIJl
RT @TomRees_MedComm: 75% of biology and biomedical #preprints are published within 8 months https://t.co/SQdbkrvMSQ
75% of biology and biomedical #preprints are published within 8 months https://t.co/SQdbkrvMSQ
RT @bnschlz: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all @biorxivpreprint preprints https://t.co/52pVj8QOgZ https://t.co/XfR7UVdTPS
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all @biorxivpreprint preprints https://t.co/52pVj8QOgZ
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @generalising: I think I've tweeted this before, but it's still interesting: data on publication rates for bioRxiv papers. ~2/3 get publ…
I think I've tweeted this before, but it's still interesting: data on publication rates for bioRxiv papers. ~2/3 get published, median time about six months, 75% of those within eight months. https://t.co/hWtVvJOBL6
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @BarakRotblat: I didn't realize how viral biorxiv really is https://t.co/TnKDHHPo7i
I didn't realize how viral biorxiv really is
Now we have a science founded reason for open access and preprints!
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
Cc @ABollmannMD 🙂
Very interesting!
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
A preprint about preprints is now a peer-reviewed paper. Waiting for the preprint about preprints about preprints.
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
RT @JohnRInglis: Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife…
Meta-analysis of papers on @biorxivpreprint, previously a preprint https://t.co/T4AHnSg2Ls, is now a peer- reviewed @eLife paper https://t.co/KEMpMYdRGD
@cehart03 @R_H_Ebright @cziscience @JohnRInglis Some relevant data on this in the rxivist preprint - https://t.co/Tqy31sfdOm
RT @DarrenJParker: Cool paper tracking the number of articles on #biorxiv, and where they end up. https://t.co/VDxw398vGF It shows that bi…
RT @ReaderMeter: For a good overview of the growth in adoption and popularity of contents from @biorxivpreprint, check out this recent stud…
RT @DarrenJParker: Cool paper tracking the number of articles on #biorxiv, and where they end up. https://t.co/VDxw398vGF It shows that bi…
RT @ReaderMeter: For a good overview of the growth in adoption and popularity of contents from @biorxivpreprint, check out this recent stud…
For a good overview of the growth in adoption and popularity of contents from @biorxivpreprint, check out this recent study by Richard Abdill and Ran Blekhman: https://t.co/t9IfeEUt6G
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @IST_IRD: augmentation du nombre de #preprints déposés dans #bioarxiv . plus de 2000 par mois. #openaccess https://t.co/shJurCmoYH
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @IST_IRD: augmentation du nombre de #preprints déposés dans #bioarxiv . plus de 2000 par mois. #openaccess https://t.co/shJurCmoYH
RT @IST_IRD: augmentation du nombre de #preprints déposés dans #bioarxiv . plus de 2000 par mois. #openaccess https://t.co/shJurCmoYH
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
augmentation du nombre de #preprints déposés dans #bioarxiv . plus de 2000 par mois. #openaccess
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
RT @C0PE: This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 200…
This interesting preprint shows that the number of preprints being posted to BioArxiv each month is increasing rapidly (over 2000 per month). They are being read widely and two thirds of them have gone on to be published in journals. https://t.co/bmTdfADC
Very interesting work investigating the impact of #Preprints on @bioRxiv on the culture of scientific publishing: https://t.co/LURPHrSwAH
@R_Sasidharan @tamar_aw good match with yesterday‘s discussion about #preprints @biorxiv_plants is this preprint @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/Hz7lMYB4Xg #senconf2019
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints - preprints on bioRxiv are being read more than ever before (1.1 million downloads in October 2018 alone) #openscience https://t.co/hqoJi2WCHq
RT @ReaderMeter: Diving into the detailed analysis of readership and outcomes of @biorxivpreprint #preprints in https://t.co/t70pDgMGIp 1/
RT @ReaderMeter: Diving into the detailed analysis of readership and outcomes of @biorxivpreprint #preprints in https://t.co/t70pDgMGIp 1/
RT @ReaderMeter: Diving into the detailed analysis of readership and outcomes of @biorxivpreprint #preprints in https://t.co/t70pDgMGIp 1/
Diving into the detailed analysis of readership and outcomes of @biorxivpreprint #preprints in https://t.co/t70pDgMGIp 1/
@caparisek @zeacology @ecolangie @arthurebarros @munozbird @MCOspinas @PaigeKouba @Avesa Re: pre-print discussion, here's an interesting article evaluating all published pre-prints posted on biorxiv (life sciences pre-print platform) since its conception i
RT @cshperspectives: Interesting plot - but there’s a false equivalence since a substantial number of papers go from bioRxiv to PlosOne and…
RT @cshperspectives: Interesting plot - but there’s a false equivalence since a substantial number of papers go from bioRxiv to PlosOne and…
@sxbegle @biorxivpreprint @hollyingrahamSF - Preprint downloads correlate w impact. Adoption seems to vary greatly amongst sub-disciplines. See https://t.co/ChzqsD7n2J & https://t.co/Togg2hTrrp. How do we get Nature, Cell & Science to publish arti
RT @cshperspectives: Interesting plot - but there’s a false equivalence since a substantial number of papers go from bioRxiv to PlosOne and…