↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

Preprints in motion: tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
235 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions
Title
Preprints in motion: tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2021.02.20.432090
Authors

Brierley, Liam, Nanni, Federico, Polka, Jessica K, Dey, Gautam, Pálfy, Máté, Fraser, Nicholas, Coates, Jonathon Alexis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#179,936
of 22,634,608 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#1,081
of 176,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,160
of 317,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#78
of 7,389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,634,608 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7,389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.