↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

Statistical learning of successor representations is related to on-task replay

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
Title
Statistical learning of successor representations is related to on-task replay
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2022.02.02.478787
Authors

Wittkuhn, Lennart, Krippner, Lena M., Schuck, Nicolas W.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#11,823,779
of 21,152,972 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#93,909
of 156,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,518
of 373,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#4,217
of 8,195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,152,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.