↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

Multiple lines of evidence indicate survival of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in Louisiana

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
124 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
279 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Multiple lines of evidence indicate survival of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in Louisiana
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2022.04.06.487399
Authors

Latta, Steven C., Michaels, Mark A., Scheifler, Don, Michot, Thomas C., Shrum, Peggy L., Johnson, Patricia, Tischendorf, Jay, Weeks, Michael, Trochet, John, Ford, Bob

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 279 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#9,789
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#130
of 187,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,261
of 22,831,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#21
of 107,665 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,831,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107,665 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.