↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

High Concentrations of floating life in the North Pacific Garbage Patch

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 6,238)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
2943 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
High Concentrations of floating life in the North Pacific Garbage Patch
Published in
bioRxiv, April 2022
DOI 10.1101/2022.04.26.489631
Authors

Fiona Chong, Matthew Spencer, Nikolai Maximenko, Jan Hafner, Andrew McWhirter, Rebecca R. Helm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,943 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1500. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,060
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#25
of 6,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307
of 449,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.