The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Expanding Parkinson’s disease genetics: novel risk loci, genomic context, causal insights and heritable risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
bioRxiv, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1101/388165 |
| Authors |
Mike A. Nalls, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Costanza L. Vallerga, Karl Heilbron, Sara Bandres-Ciga, Diana Chang, Manuela Tan, Demis A. Kia, Alastair J. Noyce, Angli Xue, Jose Bras, Emily Young, Rainer von Coelln, Javier Simón-Sánchez, Claudia Schulte, Manu Sharma, Lynne Krohn, Lasse Pihlstrom, Ari Siitonen, Hirotaka Iwaki, Hampton Leonard, Faraz Faghri, J. Raphael Gibbs, Dena G. Hernandez, Sonja W. Scholz, Juan A. Botia, Maria Martinez, Jean-Christophe Corvol, Suzanne Lesage, Joseph Jankovic, Lisa M. Shulman, The 23andMe Research Team, System Genomics of Parkinson’s Disease Consortium, Margaret Sutherland, Pentti Tienari, Kari Majamaa, Mathias Toft, Ole A. Andreassen, Tushar Bangale, Alexis Brice, Jian Yang, Ziv Gan-Or, Thomas Gasser, Peter Heutink, Joshua M Shulman, Nicolas Wood, David A. Hinds, John A. Hardy, Huw R Morris, Jacob Gratten, Peter M. Visscher, Robert R. Graham, Andrew B. Singleton, for the International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 65% |
| Scientists | 23 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#738,381
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#402
of 7,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,170
of 345,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.