↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

The impact of super-spreaders in COVID-19: mapping genome variation worldwide

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
294 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
The impact of super-spreaders in COVID-19: mapping genome variation worldwide
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.05.19.097410
Authors

Gómez-Carballa, Alberto, Bello, Xabier, Pardo-Seco, Jacobo, Martinón-Torres, Federico, Salas, Antonio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 294 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#55,859
of 16,068,491 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#260
of 99,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,859
of 291,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#52
of 8,649 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,068,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,649 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.