RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Wow, @EdwardTufte likes our #dataviz. I think I can retire happily now :) cc @richabdill
RT @EdwardTufte: Good detailed graphic, note long tails: "Tracking popularity/outcomes all bioRxiv preprints" Richard J. Abdill, Ran Blekhm…
These new ridge plots are my favorite plots now. There is really no reason to ever use a boxplot again, even when plotting distributions of many variables.
Some food for though, #datavizbook #epibookclub
RT @scholarlykitchn: Two-thirds of bioRxiv preprints posted in 2016 or earlier were later published in peer-reviewed journals, and that th…
Median time from pre-print to publication = 166 days but with some *very* long tails
RT @EdwardTufte: Good detailed graphic, note long tails: "Tracking popularity/outcomes all bioRxiv preprints" Richard J. Abdill, Ran Blekhm…
Good detailed graphic, note long tails: "Tracking popularity/outcomes all bioRxiv preprints" Richard J. Abdill, Ran Blekhman. also note inherent boxplot fail: lousy summary, over-binning, data-censoring https://t.co/cup40pSCvF (via gene-graphics tiger McHe
RT @editor_traceyd: --> GENETICS & G3 journals the fastest two on this list - this is no accident thanks to editors & reviewers & to autho…
Two-thirds of bioRxiv preprints posted in 2016 or earlier were later published in peer-reviewed journals, and that the majority of published preprints appeared in a journal less than six months after being posted. https://t.co/tYgBN386dq
RT @editor_traceyd: --> GENETICS & G3 journals the fastest two on this list - this is no accident thanks to editors & reviewers & to autho…
--> GENETICS & G3 journals the fastest two on this list - this is no accident thanks to editors & reviewers & to authors who trust us w/your work w/early online, accepted manuscripts are published online & free-to-read within days of a
RT @richabdill: 1/ Thrilled to finally share the project we've been working on: https://t.co/rTpq6Y54qP, a website for sorting bioRxiv #pre…
RT @peiferlabunc: Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times..... https://t.co/xuSzMX…
RT @peiferlabunc: Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times..... https://t.co/xuSzMX…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @pastramimachine: #G3 @GeneticsGSA represent https://t.co/s9zxXP6yGr
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @peiferlabunc: Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times..... https://t.co/xuSzMX…
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @peiferlabunc: Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times..... https://t.co/xuSzMX…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @ymouscaz: I just discovered this excellent site https://t.co/TmJfTDIjJI (@rxivist) throught this #preprint https://t.co/84qSfDV42U "Rx…
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Kudos to @GeneticsGSA and G3 as well as @mbiojournal, but @eLife is looking very good, too!
RT @peiferlabunc: Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times..... https://t.co/xuSzMX…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @peiferlabunc: Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times..... https://t.co/xuSzMX…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Might want to think twice about publishing in the journals with the ridiculously long lead times.....
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 yrs, Some 1 week | @richabdill @blekhman @UMNews @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/xTYuSODgn7 | #Jan_ReCap_2019 https://t.co/BKgjnu8Rzz
Studie von @RichardAbdill und @blekhman zu #bioRxiv zeigt wachsende Beliebtheit von #openaccess #preprints - zwei Drittel der Preprints erscheint später in regulären Journals: https://t.co/Ne8cujraoa
Voir le préprint des auteurs : Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/zLrHuP8qBH
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @EricTopol: The remarkable impact of @biorxivpreprint's 1st 30,000 preprints https://t.co/inESUI5GeZ by @JoshuaLearn1 @NatureNews a sum…
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Take note, advanced grad students ! 🧐 “Time to publish” is pretty crazy nowadays...
RT @richabdill: 1/ Thrilled to finally share the project we've been working on: https://t.co/rTpq6Y54qP, a website for sorting bioRxiv #pre…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
In which the outcomes of biology preprints uploaded to bioRxiv were analysed. 2/3 were later published in peer-review journals, most within 6 months. Preprints with the most downloads generally published in journals with high impact factors. 14/#365papers
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
PsyArXivでもいけるのかな
bioRxivプレプリントのデータベース、Rxivistを構築したという研究のプレプリントがbioRxivに。Rxivistではダウンロード数やツイート数のランキング表示などが可能。https://t.co/PuUKzgyUIV Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/kVfQlAtPJy
RT @newhealthpsych: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/UF4mRNciYr
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/UF4mRNciYr
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/GH0gz3UdSl
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
Is preprinting the way of the future? I want to know how preprints affect IP! "Preprints on bioRxiv were downloaded 1.1 million times in October 2018 alone, and preprints are being posted at a recent high of more than 2,100 per month." https://t.co/FhJ7R
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @GwenaelPG: If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
If you want to know more about outcomes of bioRxiv preprints ! https://t.co/nOhBAQeT1b
RT @biorxivpreprint: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/IUVBZBxeu4 #bioRxiv
it is so interesting to read what people understands from figure 5. i envy all those optimistic people on twitter! Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/sf19Fj1Nkq and of course it is already covered in nature news htt
RT @EricTopol: The remarkable impact of @biorxivpreprint's 1st 30,000 preprints https://t.co/inESUI5GeZ by @JoshuaLearn1 @NatureNews a sum…
RT @alex_lercher: The number of preprints explodes, 90% of #bioRxiv articles are published within a year and downloads correlate with impac…
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/ulDGWuHqVy
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
@JFattaccioli @louisaflintoft @HenriquesLab From the article (https://t.co/oW9eBCLJSF)... "we did not evaluate when these downloads occurred, relative to a preprint's publication... it is also possible that appearance in particular journals drives bioRxiv
Very interesting commentary regarding the increasing popularity of BiorXiv!
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/SvBYqnLIAA
RT @DarrenJParker: Cool paper tracking the number of articles on #biorxiv, and where they end up. https://t.co/VDxw398vGF It shows that bi…
RT @jcamthrash: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/SH9t8iBheF
RT @jcamthrash: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/SH9t8iBheF
And @hethlang‘s full poster on industry use of #preprints can be found at https://t.co/rlTvVMQ9yg
RT @jcamthrash: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/SH9t8iBheF
Really cool paper on how you can use download counts and Twitter convos to predict "high impact" #preprints https://t.co/OcPLKgxEae #OpenScience