RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @CancerConnector: Would love to see these colored by IF. General trend is longer median for higher IF, but some interesting ones outside…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @cshperspectives: Worth comparing to @clathrin numbers for t to publication in general, which I often show in talks https://t.co/QwNPjkV…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Would love to see these colored by IF. General trend is longer median for higher IF, but some interesting ones outside that. @eLife in particular - relatively fast/high - maybe because of collaborative review!? Focuses revisions, speeds process...?
Worth comparing to @clathrin numbers for t to publication in general, which I often show in talks https://t.co/QwNPjkVA50
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
Nice #dataviz!
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Cool to see @mbiojournal leading the pack.
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dsquintana: This plot loosely matches my experience, in that one of my papers took about the same time since preprinting to get accepte…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
This plot loosely matches my experience, in that one of my papers took about the same time since preprinting to get accepted at one of the journals near the top. But this only happened because of the long time it took to get rejected at one of the journals
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @dgmacarthur: Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
Alternative title: wtf, @NatureGenet? https://t.co/WVDfZYeMT9
RT @PlantEvolution: Very proud about @eLife being #2 when it comes to publishing biology’s #preprints. (With total # of published papers mu…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @cziscience: We’re proud to support open science, including preprints. Check out the top 2018 preprints from @biorxivpreprint: https://t…
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @i_jerko: So important! bioRxiv your data! https://t.co/BEh7UVehGR
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…
RT @i_jerko: So important! bioRxiv your data! https://t.co/BEh7UVehGR
So important! bioRxiv your data!
RT @mmw_lmw: Tracking bioRxiv #preprints | Interval from bioRxiv posting to date first published elsewhere: Median 166 days, 90% within 1 y…