↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

Evidence of recombination in coronaviruses implicating pangolin origins of nCoV-2019

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
138 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
Title
Evidence of recombination in coronaviruses implicating pangolin origins of nCoV-2019
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.02.07.939207
Authors

Wong, Matthew C., Javornik Cregeen, Sara J., Ajami, Nadim J., Petrosino, Joseph F.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#91,846
of 14,562,811 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#374
of 76,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,464
of 253,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#48
of 6,536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,562,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.