↓ Skip to main content

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Article Metrics

Evidence of recombination in coronaviruses implicating pangolin origins of nCoV-2019

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
150 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of recombination in coronaviruses implicating pangolin origins of nCoV-2019
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.02.07.939207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wong, Matthew C., Javornik Cregeen, Sara J., Ajami, Nadim J., Petrosino, Joseph F.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 304 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Researcher 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Other 20 7%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 55 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Other 67 22%
Unknown 67 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#113,685
of 18,432,973 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#680
of 128,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,769
of 349,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#55
of 6,534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,432,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.