Bonus! Translate full text @biorxivpreprint into any language OK so this one uses Google Translate but still, very useful! Go to https://t.co/YkJCHfFytx and then add the link (e.g.) https://t.co/59nvmPWlgW. https://t.co/bLnh8UQIgB
@ewrigleyfield This analysis of preprints has some interesting hints also. Faster review time and shorter papers for covid topics. Also, more likely to be posting their first preprint https://t.co/cMHXFq2HwM
@ewrigleyfield I was thinking of this analysis of biomed papers: "Most corresponding authors were not drastically changing fields, with category differences generally spanning reasonably related areas" (https://t.co/GcBDQb9qg8). We don't have such clean de
"We find evidence for changes in preprinting and publishing behaviour: COVID-19 preprints are shorter and reviewed faster. Our results highlight the unprecedented role of preprints and preprint servers in the dissemination of COVID-19 science" https://t.co
We also have a wider analysis of COVID preprints (just accepted for publication) here: https://t.co/59nvmPWlgW
The preprint “Preprinting the COVID-19 pandemic” (https://t.co/534kh0GhAc) has been reviewed by automated tools, find results here: https://t.co/sq4Wl4b9AQ. We detected 1 resource, open data, open code, and no limitations statement.
With people like Fauci and other public officials talking about preprints, our work provides some evidence to their use and comparability to published papers: https://t.co/Ee7xDK4cBQ & https://t.co/TK6U5hUHMm
@go_bayes @JACoates91 @arjunrajlab It already has (a part of this analysis was in v1 here: https://t.co/0RxFdGaUli), and I hope it improves further!
RT @JACoates91: We've just submitted revisions for this paper! 🎆🎇 So here are some of my favourite additions
RT @JACoates91: 1/11 This @biorxivpreprint is the result of a joyous collaboration with @Dey_Gautam @jessicapolka @nicholasmfraser @L_Brier…
RT @JACoates91: 1/11 This @biorxivpreprint is the result of a joyous collaboration with @Dey_Gautam @jessicapolka @nicholasmfraser @L_Brier…
RT @JACoates91: We've just submitted revisions for this paper! 🎆🎇 So here are some of my favourite additions
RT @JACoates91: We've just submitted revisions for this paper! 🎆🎇 So here are some of my favourite additions https://t.co/a4zDSmeyOz
RT @JACoates91: We've just submitted revisions for this paper! 🎆🎇 So here are some of my favourite additions
RT @JACoates91: We've just submitted revisions for this paper! 🎆🎇 So here are some of my favourite additions https://t.co/a4zDSmeyOz
We've just submitted revisions for this paper! 🎆🎇 So here are some of my favourite additions
@sharpmelk The first version of our preprint has some data on this. We're about to release an extended analysis next week focusing on just "quality" (https://t.co/9LEUlhHIHD).
Preprinting the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/aZx4JW5iQI
We attempted this using a number of methods and ultimately also found little difference between preprint or published versions. https://t.co/jZbXl4mPRS 16/n
RT @DSDimensions: This study looks at the importance of preprints in the research response to #COVID19 and highlights that over 16,000 arti…
RT @DSDimensions: This study looks at the importance of preprints in the research response to #COVID19 and highlights that over 16,000 arti…
RT @DSDimensions: This study looks at the importance of preprints in the research response to #COVID19 and highlights that over 16,000 arti…
RT @DSDimensions: This study looks at the importance of preprints in the research response to #COVID19 and highlights that over 16,000 arti…
RT @DSDimensions: This study looks at the importance of preprints in the research response to #COVID19 and highlights that over 16,000 arti…
This study looks at the importance of preprints in the research response to #COVID19 and highlights that over 16,000 articles were released within 4 months of 1st confirmed case, of which 6,753 were hosted by preprint servers. #12DimensionsofChristmas http
RT @JACoates91: @PracheeAC There's a few of us working on evidencing the "quality" of preprints (the same group from the covid preprints pr…
@PracheeAC There's a few of us working on evidencing the "quality" of preprints (the same group from the covid preprints preprint https://t.co/9LEUlhq7Q5 and others). On the evidence we have and have seen, on the whole preprints truly are high quality publ
RT @JACoates91: Interesting article. Our recent work (now under review) gives evidence to the claims made about the role preprints have pla…
Interesting article. Our recent work (now under review) gives evidence to the claims made about the role preprints have played in COVID research and dissemination. (if you wanted further reading) https://t.co/9LEUlhq7Q5
Preprinting the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/Hh03C9r59z COVID-19 preprints are shorter, have fewer words, are getting more scientific/clinical attention
So Meta: A #Preprint about #COVID preprint trends. https://t.co/l9SyLNwvqX
We'll be using this preprint as a springboard for a broader discussion. As always, all of my slides and notes (and even some data!) will be made openly available. https://t.co/gBT7JlaFJB
@JeroenBaas @MsPhelps Interesting - not sure how many COVID articles are in Scopus, but Dimensions has ~137k, whilst our dataset has ~28k preprints: based on those, preprints account for ~17% of the COVID literature. In the first 4 months of the outbreak i
RT @ctyerkes: Preprinting the #Covid19 pandemic: #preprint by @jessicapolka et al looking at attributes, access/usage rates of Covid prepri…
Preprinting the #Covid19 pandemic: #preprint by @jessicapolka et al looking at attributes, access/usage rates of Covid preprints and sharing characteristics @PEERe_REVIEW https://t.co/DPx0i08Tci
RT @JACoates91: Version 2 of the preprint is up! This is also the version we have submitted! thread for a brief overview of what changed: h…
RT @JACoates91: Version 2 of the preprint is up! This is also the version we have submitted! thread for a brief overview of what changed: h…
Contribute a rapid review or request one for "Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic" (https://t.co/X5UAH0YklB). "Add" or "Request" w/DOI (10.1101/2020.05.22.111294) at https://t.co/RnurTL3DyM @outbreaksci @PREreview_
Updated #SARSCoV preprint: Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/X5UAH0YklB
RT @JACoates91: Version 2 of the preprint is up! This is also the version we have submitted! thread for a brief overview of what changed: h…
RT @JACoates91: Version 2 of the preprint is up! This is also the version we have submitted! thread for a brief overview of what changed: h…
RT @JACoates91: Version 2 of the preprint is up! This is also the version we have submitted! thread for a brief overview of what changed: h…
Great to have been part of this collaboration for the past few months!!
Version 2 of the preprint is up! This is also the version we have submitted! thread for a brief overview of what changed: https://t.co/Zy3BE5rrjB
RT @ReaderMeter: @LizzieGadd Interesting to compare this with https://t.co/WBwMM9ystY and https://t.co/VVZd0P1raQ which respectively find a…
@cshperspectives @pavi_narayanan @biorxivpreprint @PlantEvolution @slavov_n @ASAPbio_ @eLife Preprint on impact of COVID-19 on preprinting rates: https://t.co/27LRRy6ex8
@LizzieGadd Interesting to compare this with https://t.co/WBwMM9ystY and https://t.co/VVZd0P1raQ which respectively find a 150 and 166 day median time from preprint to publication in the context of outbreaks. 5-13 months lost to scientific discourse when a
@socofthesacred Soc is definitely behind econ. Someone should study this. Easy design is to sample papers in journals and search for preprints. Other disciplines are also way ahead of us on studying their own publishing behavior and norms. E.g., this grea
RT @JACoates91: Very happy that our preprint was selected for this. We we already underway with a v2 before we submitted but now we can als…
RT @JACoates91: Very happy that our preprint was selected for this. We we already underway with a v2 before we submitted but now we can als…
Very happy that our preprint was selected for this. We we already underway with a v2 before we submitted but now we can also address reviewer comments and make the initial submission even stronger. V1 available here, v2 coming soon: https://t.co/9LEUlhq7Q5
RT @JACoates91: 1/11 This @biorxivpreprint is the result of a joyous collaboration with @Dey_Gautam @jessicapolka @nicholasmfraser @L_Brier…
Sabías que... 👩🔬Los archivos de Preprints son una adición reciente al ciclo de la publicación científica en Biología y Medicina 👩🔬Aceleran la difusión de resultados preliminates 👩🔬Permiten la recolección de comentarios 👩🔬Es una etapa intermedia en
@lisafederer @MsPhelps @amylibrarian @nicholasmfraser Good analysis of biorxiv and medrvix: https://t.co/cMHXFq2HwM
RT @JACoates91: We're thrilled with the attention our recent work has been getting (https://t.co/zAQdnG8fo5)! Thanks @benwupton for this ex…
Thanks Jonny!
We're thrilled with the attention our recent work has been getting (https://t.co/zAQdnG8fo5)! Thanks @benwupton for this excellent piece mentioning us in @ResearchEurope; will the changes to open access outlive #COVID19? read more -> https://t.co/PwRbT
@mzelst @MicheleNuijten @JelteWicherts @TilburgU Just adding to this, we checked ~100 preprint paper pairs and found little difference between them (not looking at stats). It'd definitely be interesting to look at that! https://t.co/jubfqh2NOR
A few months ago, someone here sarcastically welcomed the season of two figure papers. Seems the person was right in the prediction. https://t.co/t0Riy7CBVQ Putting anything on paper doesn't make it true though and evaluation of data is basically our tra
RT @MsPhelps: @mattjhodgkinson @medrxivpreprint Info on numbers of #COVID19 preprints compared to published papers from https://t.co/hr3UO…
@mattjhodgkinson @medrxivpreprint Info on numbers of #COVID19 preprints compared to published papers from https://t.co/hr3UOTP0K3 https://t.co/ezuLmA0wEO
RT @jessicapolka: @UnhealthyAlcDrg @EASEeditors Preprints on EuropePMC appear on average 4 months earlier than papers. Most preprints chang…
RT @jessicapolka: @UnhealthyAlcDrg @EASEeditors Preprints on EuropePMC appear on average 4 months earlier than papers. Most preprints chang…
@UnhealthyAlcDrg @EASEeditors Preprints on EuropePMC appear on average 4 months earlier than papers. Most preprints change little in terms of their conclusion when published in final form: https://t.co/iMZDDdKNsn #EASEevents
RT @mattjhodgkinson: Preprints on #COVID19 are much shorter than non-COVID #preprints, shows @jessicapolka. https://t.co/D3x61FaQVn #EASEev…
RT @mattjhodgkinson: Preprints on #COVID19 are much shorter than non-COVID #preprints, shows @jessicapolka. https://t.co/D3x61FaQVn #EASEev…
Preprints on #COVID19 are much shorter than non-COVID #preprints, shows @jessicapolka. https://t.co/D3x61FaQVn #EASEevents https://t.co/2yQp7MOKSI
An excellent analysis on preprinting during the #COVID__19 pandemic from an alumnus of our group @mate_palfy Great read & interesting data showing relevant trends for all of us who submit and cite preprints. Thanks for the authors for the useful work!
RT @charlie_lees: Whilst researching the latest data on COVID for the @my_ueg webinar tonight I was struck by the massive increase in prepr…
RT @charlie_lees: Whilst researching the latest data on COVID for the @my_ueg webinar tonight I was struck by the massive increase in prepr…
"It is also interesting to note that several preprints received negatively by the scientific community are amongst the most tweeted". Preprint servers clearly have a host of advantages, but their rise also makes it easier for misinformation to spread at cr
Whilst researching the latest data on COVID for the @my_ueg webinar tonight I was struck by the massive increase in preprint publishing of papers. The irony of finding a reference to this on @biorxivpreprint was too good not to share! https://t.co/0XrCclX
@tatiroque @NEJM Revisão por pares rápida tem sido rotina pra praticamente todos os papers de COVID, com cloroquina ou não, por razões óbvias (e justificáveis): https://t.co/xZLlpJOal8
RT @NikosNtoumanis: Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic; https://t.co/qBXvGbmSEx
Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic; https://t.co/qBXvGbmSEx
Great piece in @NatureNews (https://t.co/qewfEBsfsl) and using a similar approach to ours for checking how authors are switching fields for #COVID research (https://t.co/zAQdnFQEwx)
Analysis of med/bio preprints about COVID-19 finds explosion of papers, many subsequently appearing in journals with little change to their findings.
RT @ZBW_MediaTalk: Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/ZWwN2a6OEB
Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/ZWwN2a6OEB
Not seen our latest work? Have a rewd here https://t.co/9LEUlhq7Q5
RT @irenehames: Of the >16,000 COVID-19 related scientific articles to appear within 4 months of 1st confirmed case, at least 6000 were on…
Of the >16,000 COVID-19 related scientific articles to appear within 4 months of 1st confirmed case, at least 6000 were on #preprint servers. Very interesting analysis of the 2527 @biorxivpreprint & @medrxivpreprint #COVID19 #preprints https://t.co/
Preprinting a pandemic: “Our results highlight the unprecedented role of preprints and preprint servers in the dissemination of COVID-19 science, and the likely long-term impact of the pandemic on the scientific publishing landscape.” https://t.co/335KSr5
RT @Dey_Gautam: ICYMI: the results are in! More scientists than ever are using #preprints to share #COVIDー19 #SARSCoV2 research - also shor…
RT @cshperspectives: Great study on preprints in the #COVID19 pandemic, showing they're 40% of the literature, widely shared, shorter, & mo…
PNC has plaudited this: Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/oudEsIlfkI
Raw material for future science studies, I suppose.
“Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic” https://t.co/Y6r1Eq64Q4 a preprint from @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/lkiTXibHQP
RT @lfvopenscience: Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/la3mwmHHEq
Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/la3mwmHHEq
Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/6Jrfax1hQN via @L_Brierley et al
RT @MattGrossmann: scientists have released over 16,000 COVID-19 related scientific articles within 4 months of the first confirmed case; a…
scientists have released over 16,000 COVID-19 related scientific articles within 4 months of the first confirmed case; at least 6,000 were hosted by preprint servers. COVID-19 preprints are accessed & distributed at least 15 times more than others htt
RT @Dey_Gautam: ICYMI: the results are in! More scientists than ever are using #preprints to share #COVIDー19 #SARSCoV2 research - also shor…
RT @JACoates91: 1/11 This @biorxivpreprint is the result of a joyous collaboration with @Dey_Gautam @jessicapolka @nicholasmfraser @L_Brier…
RT @RickyPo: Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic https://t.co/N1hfTGKwMC
Preprinting a Pandemic: The Role of Preprints in the COVID-19 Pandemic – via @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/m4XAlgzJic
Statistika istraživačke vitalnosti na uzorku od šest tisuća članaka o pandemiji: preprinti kao samizdati, slabo utemeljeni naspram provjerenih, tvitani i citirani.
Fast science in pandemic times. https://t.co/Y9HEoP3zKe & Simon Porter's forthcoming (next week) : COVID-19 and preprint publishing culture #covid_science_studies